Dear Grab Team
Iโm writing to let you know about a bug in your app that I hope you will fix at the earliest convenience.
You see, when you relaunched GrabRewards in August 2017, it seemed like you guys had no idea what a rewards program was supposed to look like. 8,000 points for a 20% off Zalora voucher with a minimum spend of $120 plus a long exclusion list? 3,000 points for a 12% off Althea voucher with a minimum spend of $50 and maximum discount of $10?
But over time, the selection improved, which led me to believe youโd learned to source rewards with genuine value, instead of coupons youโd expect to receive in your spam folder. You added KrisFlyer as a partner program. You gave people an incentive to earn Platinum by providing favorable redemption rates for Grab vouchers.
So when I opened up my Grab app this morning and saw that GrabRewards earning rates had been cut by up to 90%, I knew immediately that something must be wrong. After all, there was no prior notice or warning. Just a cheerful push notification, proudly stating โmore ways to earn points!โ
I knew that this had to be a bug because back in May when people were complaining about the lack of promo codes, your country head saidโ
โThe discounts you get from your Grab rides are still there. You just need to redeem them from the rewards catalogueโฆ I personally believe it is more exciting that way, rather than just promosโ
It was clear to me that he was proposing the following deal: we wonโt give you upfront discounts through promo codes, but weโre going to make it up to you by backloading discounts through rewards redemptions. That was logical, because it rewarded people who were loyal to Grab and motivated them to keep earning. And although I found it hard to believe that people would prefer spending their points to getting free $3 off codes in their mail, I knew he was referring to the motivational aspect of rewards programsโ the psychological feeling of accomplishment when you earn your award.
Thatโs why Iโm certain this sudden change in earning rates must be a bug, because what he said would make no sense at all if the program could devalue without notice. Think about it: wouldnโt a rewards program lose its motivational element if value could disappear at a Thanos-esque snap of the fingers? If I went to bed having to spend $120 to earn a $5 voucher and woke up having to spend $367?
I mean, devaluing without notice would be fundamentally damaging to the fabric of your loyalty program. Imagine you lived in a country where the government could declare overnight that todayโs $1 would buy $0.50 of goods tomorrow. You wouldnโt have much faith in that currency, right? And, if given a choice, youโd start acquiring other, more stable currencies. Come on, itโs an entire chapter in our Social Studies textbooks- Japanese Occupation, Straits Dollars, Banana Money.
So thereโs no way you could have devalued without notice, Grab, because by doing so youโd be turning your points into Banana Money. Moreover, youโd be creating an incredible disincentive to earn GrabRewards points, which wouldnโt make sense for you either.
Another thing: it seems this bug isnโt just affecting the earning rates; itโs also affecting the cost of redemptions. When I went to bed, elite members enjoyed a discount on Grab vouchers. But when I woke up, the cost of vouchers was now the same across the board!
$5 | $10 | $15 | $20 | $25 | |
Member | 2,200 | 4,200 | 6,000 | 7,400 | 9,000 |
Silver | 2,200 | 4,200 | 6,000 | 7,400 | 9,000 |
Gold | 2,200 | 4,200 | 6,000 | 7,400 | 9,000 |
Platinum | 2,200 | 4,200 | 6,000 | 7,400 | 9,000 |
Thereโs no way this is correct, because your social media channels have made it very clear that youโre actively looking to better reward your loyal customers. It would be a very strange way of rewarding loyalty if a Platinum member who spent more than $1,000 with Grab over the last 6 months suddenly had to pay the same prices as someone who signed up today!
All that said guys, I tell you the number one reason Iโm convinced all this is a simple misunderstanding: Moves like this would be something youโd expect in a market where one participant wielded an unhealthy amount of market power. And we know thatโs simply not the case here. After all, in your objection to the CCCSโs report, didnโt you say that-
โthe CCCS has not taken into account the dynamic developments and intense competition going on over the past few months, from both new and incumbent taxi and ride-hailing players.โ
Right on! In a market with intense competition as this, how could a provider show such disdain for its loyal members knowing full well they have a veritable smorgasbord of alternatives to turn to? How could they insult their intelligence by spinning this as an enhancement? How could they expect members to stay loyal in the future when itโs not reciprocated? It would be completely unthinkable!
Therefore, I hope your team has time over the weekend to make the necessary fixes to GrabRewards. And no hard feelings- we know itโs an innocent mistake and you didnโt mean to make all these changes.
Because youโd just be pissing off your most loyal customers if not.
Best regards,
The Milelion
P.S: there are a lot of people on your Facebook page reporting this same bug. But I think your Facebook page has an error as well, because the admins keep sending template responses instead of genuine answers. You might want to get this checked too.
Super like this. Canโt wait to hear their response
Aaron you should work for Grabโs membership rewards division and Mileslife.
This should be forwarded to ccs as well
Must be the chat bots replying the Facebook messages.
[โฆ] going to take some time to pen down a few more thoughts on this over the weekend, but suffice to say, this is not how you run a loyalty program. Unannounced [โฆ]
base on my experience, from B side POV, This is very normal. Business like Grab doesnโt need reward programs because it is monopoly now. If I run the company, I will cut the program. Please note: loyalty program and reward program are two things, it is not a must to have both because both cost money
Even though Grab had every right to devalue its grabrewards program, the timing of the devaluation suggest that Grab is engaging in a monopolistic behavior. CCCS in Singapore generally lacks the willpower to do anything meaningful but perhaps hundreds of complaints might force them to do something eventually
https://www.cccs.gov.sg/approach-cccs/making-complaints/complaint-online-form
Can a business be sustainable with perpetual promos and incentives? When the winner finally emerged and the industry stabilised, losses need to be recouped and fares or any promos need to be reviewed and adjusted. One needs to be realistic that there will not be subsidized or $1 fare anymore. Market forces will prevail.
If a business cannot be sustained with perpetual promos and incentives, do not start operating the business which such promos and incentives. Iโm not saying they shouldnโt be allowed to devaule the program but the timing suggest predatory and monopolistic behaviour at play. They have the right to do so just not at this time given that theyโre the only major game in town
Devaluations happen. Unannounced Devaluations, however, are really not cool
I donโt think they careโฆ
Why complain, this FIRST WORLD SERVICE LEH.
My gut feeling about grab was right all along. Thank goodness I only signed up for their free $20 credit tie up with Singapore Air. I suppose Iโd still use them overseas if theyโre still competitive.
Do they exist anywhere else, I thought it was only in Singapore
Yup, fairly useful in Thailand, and theyโre elsewhere too
[โฆ] cash out. Itโs good to note that BOC points can be redeemed for GV vouchers, Grab vouchers (snigger) and other gifts, so even if you canโt hit the minimum balance for miles youโll still [โฆ]
[โฆ] no-notice slashing of GrabRewards earning rates and hiking of redemption prices for elite members was just an innocent mistake after [โฆ]