Emirates launched their new 777 First, Business and Economy class products at the Dubai Air Show on Sunday. These products (you can view the full details on their microsite here) will debut on their Brussels and Geneva routes from December 1,2017, and eventually make their way onto the A380s. The proximity of this launch (both in terms of timing and consumer perception) to SQโs new A380 cabin products means that comparisons will be inevitable, and thatโs exactly what Iโm going to do. In this post, Iโll talk about Emiratesโ new Business Class. You can read my thoughts on how Emiratesโ new First Class stacks up to SQโs here.
Emiratesโ new business class hard product is a decade behind SQโsโฆ
Letโs again start with the hard specs, although there should be nothing new here that surprises anyone, given that we already knew the details in 2016 back when the seat was unveiled at ITB Berlin.
Emiratesโ new business class is โinspired by the interior of a modern sports carโ and convert into full flat beds of 78 inches long, with 72 inch seat pitch and 20.5 inch width. You get a 23 inch HD screen, plus a personal mini-bar. There are 42 seats in total in a 2-3-2 configuration.
Wait, 2-3-2?


Yup, you heard me right. Just like Emiratesโ old business class on the 777, the new business class is also 2-3-2 configured. As in โI have to climb over someone to access the aisle in 43% of the seats 2-3-2โ. As in โwow, the guy in the middle seat is going to feel really confined 2-3-2โ. As in โwhy am I paying business class prices for a middle seat 2-3-2โ.
Compared to Emiratesโ old business class, then, the main upgrade is that the seats now go full flat. Yes, it may surprise you to know that Emirates still doesnโt have full flat business class

Itโs 2017. All aisle access has been the global standard since the middle of the last decade. It is simply unacceptable for an airline, especially one purporting to set new standards for luxury, to go with anything else.

This means the only Emirates business class with all-aisle access will continue to be their A380s, which admittedly form a large part of the fleet, although the 777s still outnumber them.
Itโs not even going to be that common
Even if you see the current business class as remotely competitive to SQโs, thereโs no hiding the fact that the existing 777 fleet will not be retrofitted with this product. The new product will only be available on new 777Ws, which means that by the end of 2019 there will only be nine aircraft with this new seat. Nine! Let that sink in for a moment, as you consider the fact that Emirates will be operating a hundred plus planes with angled lie flat seats in business class.
It looks like Emirates will offer a 1-2-1 product on its new 777X jets that will be delivered to the airline from 2020, but thatโs still an appallingly long period of time to be without full flat, full aisle access business class seats in a significant proportion of your long haul fleet.
So letโs recap. SQ is taking what is already an incredible business class seat and adding features like a double bed (in selected seats), better noise insulation, greater privacy and fixing what I thought was the biggest drawback (the need to flip over the seat as opposed to infinite recline). Whatโs the best feature that Emirates has to offer in business class? A mini-bar.

There is absolutely no way Emiratesโ new product can compete with what SQ has to offer. Iโd gladly take SQโs 2006 business class seat over Emiratesโ latest business class any day of the week.
โฆbut Emiratesโ connectivity and ground experience still tops SQโs
The silver lining for Emirates is their superior connectivity through Dubai and better ground services compared to SQ and Singapore.
All roads lead to Dubai. Or at least through Dubai
Iโm convinced that at least part of the reason why Emirates has been able to fill business class cabins with an uncompetitive business class product (at least on the 777s) is that they offer unrivaled connectivity through Dubai. Their short connections and ability to offer 1 stop connectivity to almost everywhere on the globe through Dubai is invaluable to people who need to get there, and get there fast.
SQ, on the other hand, is at least two stops if youโre trying to fly from North America to anywhere other than Singapore. That will, of course, change when SQ gets its new A350s and resumes non stop service to the USA, but geographically speaking Singapore is at a disadvantage for a large portion of the worldโs connecting traffic.
Emirates serves 141 destinations through Dubai; Singapore Airlines serves 62 through Singapore. Those numbers disguise the comfort of getting there, but you canโt compete with Emirates if you donโt serve the same route as Emirates. And those numbers are what matters to business travelers.
A massive lounge and chauffeur driven airport transfers for all business class passengers
Emiratesโ business class lounge in Dubai is massive and spans the length of the terminal. Youโd need 12 minutes to walk from one end to the other. You can board your flight directly through the lounge, and by all reports itโs a great place to pass time. Thereโs nothing wrong per se with SQโs home lounge in Terminal 3 (Terminal 2 is dire, though), but itโs definitely not the all-encompassing experience that Emirates delivers.
Emirates also offers all business class passengers complimentary chauffeur drive service in 70 countries worldwide. I still canโt figure out why SQ refuses to offer something similar at least in Singapore, which is small enough for this to be economically feasible (he said smugly as he reclined in his armchair, without knowing anything at all about SQโs internal operating position).
Conclusion-inferior product by far, but will business customers choose better connectivity?
This is an interesting one for me: Emirates business class cannot compete with SQโs in the air (Iโd argue that SQโs business class is even better than Emirateโs full flat 1-2-1 on their A380s), but they offer greater connectivity to a wider variety of destinations than SQ. So what do business travelers think? Do they go for something that gets them there faster, or gets them there in more comfort?
As a business flyer, am I willing to accept a high density 2-3-2 configuration where itโs likely wherever I sit that at some point during the flight, I will disturb/be disturbed by someone who needs to use the loo? Would I give up SQโs excellent hard product for a faster flight to where I need to go? For me, personally, I always solve for comfort.
I mentioned in the First Class comparison article that Emirates has won the branding battle with the launch of their new cabin products. This will probably create a halo effect around the rest of their fleet, reinforcing the idea in the average consumerโs mind that Emirates is a cut above the rest.
So I think Emirates has played this smart, to a certain extent. They have won the headlines with their new First Class, which will somewhat gloss over the underwhelming Business Class and more importantly, subdue the talk in the mainstream media about SQโs new suites. However, the scarce availability of the new First Class has the potential to create a lot of disappointed customers. Moreover, this Business Class seat simply cannot compare with what SQ has to offer. To say it is a decade behind is charitable, and all the talk about โinspiration from a modern sports carโ isnโt going to fix a fundamentally uncompetitive hard product.
Those are my thoughts on Emiratesโ new Business Class. How do you think it measures up to SQโs?
Admittedly I am not a frequent traveller, but SQ is not Emiratesโ only competitor โ also, pax pick airlines and flights for more than cabin ambience and seats. The business class seats, thankfully on fewer and fewer equipment, are those that stick us at an angle in a herringbone pattern. CXโs are the most memorable and are narrow to boot.
My grouse about SQ is the decline in housekeeping, especially inflight. Airlines provide few enough toilets without having them grubby and smelly.
And why, after this time, do airlines still have problematic and awkward to use in flight audio-visual systems?
Oh yes, for sure. Etihad is probably a closer comparison than SQ. But SQโs most relevant and familiar to our readers. Always good to benchmark!
As a Sydney based reader, geography isnโt largely an issue. We can fly one stop to Europe, Africa and America on either SQ or EK. So it comes down to alliances and airports. OW and *A are both good. DXB is a shocker and SIN is a dream. So for us, geography only comes into it when weโre connecting into Asia. EK doesnโt even rate (save for India) and SQ blitzes.
Iโm still very much a newbie to the miles and points game, but isnโt the one Emirates is losing out to not SQ but other Middle Eastern airlines, especially Qatar? Iโve only flown on Qatar business once, but I thought it was an excellent product โ both hard and soft, and you get more or less the same connectivity through Qatar as through Emirates (maybe with a very slightly longer layover). Since Dohaโs revamp a couple years ago the terminals are far more pleasant than Dubai, even if not up to Changi standards. Most of my flights are between SGโฆ Read more ยป
Yup, Emirates competes more with qatar/etihad, but in general the spectre of the me3 hangs over many airlines in sea
Actually, this seat is already in service on about 10 or so 77Ws in the EK fleet, and with the remaining 9, itโll probably total about 20 aircraft with this product by the time theyโre done. Still a rather ordinary product but it works for their business model so why not?
The moment they configured the class with the 2-3-2 it was doomed in our eyesโฆ
Premium cabins account for most of all top airlines profitability. Therefore I felt a relief for SQ because Emirates is a bigger headwind for SQ. Qatar and Etihad are still in blatant disregards to profit by living lavishly but dangerously for a long time and due to wake up soon. in fact, Etihad has bled to a stage whereby they are cutting almost every corners in their premium cabins.
Bottom lineโฆ I completely dislike the 2-3-2 config. SG all the way just for that reason.
Yup! After paying a premium and have someone climb over you. Puhleeazeโฆ..
โinferior product by far, but will business customers choose better connectivity?โ
Not for this traveller ๐
If i am gonna spend 14 hours in the air, i do not want to be third-wheel charlie stuck in the middle. Lounges are nice but you can always adjust your ground schedule. What is really important is comfort in the air. In this case, your title conclusion is right on : SQ biz class is the more comfortable in-flight experience.
Well put, but with double the destinations that SQ hasโฆ
Isnโt that shortfall what the Star Alliance partners are supposed to address? ๐
(fly the bulk of the leg on SQ then do the short haul remainder on the partner, assuming the option is available and the price is acceptableโฆ)
I refuse to fly Emirates (or any other of the ME3) as a matter of principle. The ME3 operate at a loss, only to be propped up by the oil money from their governments. I donโt fancy giving my money to an entity representative of a society and perhaps even a government that condones the joke of a way they treat the female sex.