Hands up, who saw this coming?
Alaska Airlines has just announced that they will join the oneworld alliance as a full member by Summer 2021, becoming the allianceโs second member in the USA after American Airlines.
Hereโs the timeline that Alaska has shared, which shows how theyโll progressively deepen their off-again, on-again partnership with American, before finally joining oneworld in 2021.
Some key landmarks include the ability to earn Alaska miles on all American flights (both domestic and international), and Americanโs launch of non-stop service from Seattle (Alaskaโs home base) to Bangalore and London-Heathrow. Alaska elite members will also eventually enjoy full oneworld privileges, like lounge access and additional baggage allowances.
But none of that is likely to interest Singapore-based Mileage Plan members. After all, most of us arenโt flying on American Airlines (they donโt even serve SIN) or holding Alaska elite status (unless perhaps you credited those Cathay error fares to Mileage Plan).
So what does it mean for someone whose main interaction with Mileage Plan is buying miles when they go on sale, and perhaps crediting the odd Singapore Airlines flight?
More redemption partners and the end of geographical restrictions (at least for oneworld)
Alaska Mileage Plan miles can currently be redeemed on 7 oneworld member carriers, under their existing bilateral agreements. This will expand to cover all oneworld airlines once Alaska joins, providing more redemption options for Mileage Plan members.
The following oneworld airlines are currently not redemption partners with Mileage Plan: Iberia, Malaysia Airlines, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian, S7 Airlines, Sri Lankan Airlines, Royal Air Maroc (joins oneworld on 1 April 2020) |
Moreover, itโs likely weโll see the end of Alaskaโs geographically-restricted routings. For example, Alaska Miles can currently be redeemed for Cathay Pacific flights between Hong Kong and Europe, but not Singapore and Europe.
Furthermore, Alaskaโs current award routing rules limit you to a single partner when redeeming miles. For example, you canโt redeem a single SIN-HKG-LAX award with SIN-HKG on Cathay Pacific, and HKG-LAX on American Airlines.
Presumably, these restrictions will be removed once Alaska joins oneworld. This provides more flexibility and routing options for those of us based in Singapore.
Do note that geographical restrictions may still apply for Mileage Plan partners outside of oneworld, like Emirates or Singapore Airlines |
A possible devaluation of the award chart

Once Alaska joins oneworld, theyโre almost certain to consolidate their various partner charts into a single one. Thereโs been some concerns that a devaluation will happen in the process, and weโll lose sweet spots like Singapore to Tokyo (25,000 miles on JAL Business) and Singapore to New York (70,000 miles on CX First).
While I think itโs likely weโll see some price increases in the combined oneworld chart, I donโt think itโs a foregone conclusion that all the sweet spots will vanish.
After all, award chart arbitrage exists across all alliances. Take Singapore to London for example. The cost of this award can vary from 45,000 to 105,000 miles, a difference of more than 2X!
One-way Business Class | |
Turkish Airlines Miles&Smiles | 45,000 |
Lufthansa Miles & More | 71,000 |
Air Canada Aeroplan | 75,000 |
KrisFlyer | 92,000 |
United MileagePlus | 100,000 |
Thai Royal Orchid Plus | 105,000 |
Or consider Singapore to San Francisco, where award costs range from 71,000 to 132,000 miles, also roughly a 2X difference.
One-way Business Class | |
Lufthansa Miles&More | 71,000 |
EVA Infinity Mileagelands | 75,000 |
United MileagePlus | 90,000 |
KrisFlyer | 95,000 |
Thai Royal Orchid Plus | 132,000 |
In other words, it doesnโt follow that joining an alliance means harmonizing award redemption rates. If other oneworld FFP members, lured by the sweet spots in the Alaksa chart, start crediting flights en masse to Mileage Plan, itโs more likely weโll see an adjustment on the accruals side instead. Thatโs bad for people who credit flights to Mileage Plan, but it doesnโt affect you if you only ever buy Alaska Miles.
On another note, award prices may remain the same, but there can be other non-price changes that effectively amount to devaluations. Will one-way awards price at 50% of round-trips? Will multi-carrier awards be available? Will stopovers be allowed? Will the chart change from zone to distance based?
Many questions, but no answers for now.
Non-oneworld partnerships may end, or be scaled down
One of the best features of Alaska Mileage Plan is their eclectic mix of redemption partners. This cuts across alliances, making Alaska Miles a kind of โmulti-currencyโ, if you will.
As the table below shows, although the vast majority of Alaskaโs partners are part of oneworld, they also have one SkyTeam, one Star Alliance and five unaffiliated partners.
Does Alaska joining oneworld mean that all extra-alliance partnerships will be terminated?
Not necessarily. First of all, thereโs no reason why an airline canโt be part of one alliance while having a bilateral partnership with an airline from another alliance. We see this all the time- ANA members (Star Alliance) can redeem their miles for flights on Garuda (SkyTeam), and Asia Miles members (oneworld) can redeem their miles for flights on Air Canada, Air China, Austrian, Air New Zealand, Lufthansa, Shenzhen Airlines and SWISS (all Star Alliance).
However, where these cross-alliance partnerships do exist, theyโre usually restricted in scope. For example, Asia Miles can only be redeemed on Lufthansa flights within Germany, or between Hong Kong and Frankfurt/Munich. ANA miles can only be accrued when flying Garuda-operated codeshare routes.

Therefore, itโs likely weโll see some of Alaskaโs non-oneworld partnerships scaled down over the next 12 months. No one knows exactly what this entails yet, but my sense is the more closely a given non-oneworld partner competes with a oneworld member, the more likely that partnership is to end. In other words, Aer Lingus and Condor should be safe, but other agreements (like Singapore Airlines) may be on the chopping block.
Even if Alaska does nerf the Singapore Airlines partnership, itโs no big loss as far as redemptions are concerned. As I wrote previously, the Alaska award chart for Singapore Airlines doesnโt represent great value. In fact, unless youโre regularly crediting revenue Business Class tickets on Singapore Airlines to Mileage Plan, youโre better off spending your Alaska Miles elsewhere.
For what itโs worth, Alaska has stated explicitly that โagreements with our current valued Global Partners will continue uninterruptedโ. I take that to mean โfor nowโ, because itโs highly likely thereโll be changes afoot.
Conclusion
Alaskaโs announcement that it will join oneworld has created more questions than answers, but tl;dr: nothing changes for now.
If your main interaction with Mileage Plan is during the miles sales, then you should know that the Alaska miles youโve purchased will still be redeemable for sweet spots on Cathay Pacific and Japan Airlines. Youโll also continue to enjoy very generous accrual rates when crediting Singapore Airlines Business Class fares.
At the same time however, you should not speculatively purchase miles or credit them to Mileage Plan without a clear plan of how to burn them in the next 6 months. Joining an alliance involves a lot of work, and I imagine the immediate focus will be on areas other than the loyalty program. Beyond that weโre likely to see some changes, and not all of them will be positive.
I made MVP Gold last year with CX error fare and some mileage run. Sadly this is probably the last time I make MVP Gold after AS devalued QF cheap economy fare earning.
On the other topic, AS does not need SQ, but AS is important for SQ for US destinations, IMO. SQ and UA are not on good terms and AS is a valuable connecting partner for SQ, I think.
Itโs an interesting qn who needs who more: SQ or AS. Youโre right that ua and SQ hate each otherโs guts, and the play for AS was to get more connecting international traffic- but if theyโre really expanding the partnership with AA then ASโs problem is solved for. Sq on the other hand, will have to rely more on their JetBlue codeshare (is that still around)?