๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Last call: Sign up for AMEX My Travel Insurance and get Accor Plus, Samsonite luggage, Grab vouchers and bonus miles.

What counts as lounge pass abuse?

With banks cutting back on unlimited lounge access, is lounge pass abuse to blame? And just how do you define that, anyway?

Itโ€™s time to tackle a contentious question: what exactly counts as lounge pass abuse?

With the AMEX Platinum Charge, Citi Prestige, StanChart Priority Private and UOB Visa Infinite Metal Card all removing or planning to remove unlimited lounge visits, many have been quick to point the finger at so-called โ€œlounge pass abusersโ€.

But defining the term isnโ€™t exactly straightforward, because an unlimited lounge pass is a bit like an eat-all-you-can buffet. The customer is given wide discretion as to how much theyโ€™ll partake, and while there are a few general rules that Iโ€™m sure everyone can agree on (e.g. itโ€™s wrong to sneak in without paying), there are also a lot of grey areas up for debate.

So I donโ€™t expect weโ€™ll reach a consensus on this, and I certainly donโ€™t claim to have the final word on it, but here goesโ€ฆ

Unlimited access lounge passes are getting axed

Are unlimited lounge benefits becoming a thing of the past?

2025 has been a rough year for lounge access benefits, with multiple banks placing caps on formerly unlimited usage.

  • In February 2025, the AMEX Platinum Charge capped Priority Pass visits for the first supplementary cardholder at eight per year (was: unlimited + 1 guest)
  • In June 2025, StanChart Priority Private customers had their Priority Pass visits reduced to 24 per year (was: unlimited + 1 guest)
  • In April 2025, the UOB Visa Infinite Metal Card quietly added a cooldown period of at least four hours between DragonPass utilisations. It will also cap DragonPass visits at 12 per year from June 2026 (currently: unlimited + 1 guest)
  • In July 2025, the Citi Prestige Card will cap Priority Pass visits at 12 per year (currently: unlimited + 1 guest)

Once the dust has settled, the HSBC Visa Infinite and OCBC VOYAGE Card will be the only two remaining $120K cards offering unlimited lounge visits. But even then, both have limitations: 

  • The HSBC Visa Infinite offers unlimited LoungeKey visits for the principal cardholder and up to five supplementary cardholders, but has been closed to new applications since September 2024. A relaunch is planned, but I wouldnโ€™t count on it continuing to be this generous
  • The OCBC VOYAGE Card offers unlimited DragonPass visits for the principal cardholder, but does not include airport restaurants, so itโ€™s already pre-nerfed in a sense

At the rate things are going, it could only be a matter of time before unlimited lounge visits is a perk found exclusively on cards with four-digit annual fees. 

๐Ÿ’ณ Credit Cards with Unlimited Lounge Visits
Card Min. Income Annual Fee Remarks
OCBC VOYAGE Card
Apply
S$120K  S$498 Principal#
HSBC Visa Infinite
Apply
S$120K S$662* Principal
4x Supp
StanChart Beyond Card
Apply
S$200K S$1,635 Principal
3x Supp
AMEX Platinum Charge
Apply
Not stated S$1,744 Principal#
All Supp^
DBS Insignia Card S$500K  S$3,270 Principal
UOB Reserve Card S$500K S$3,924 Principal
All Supp
Citi ULTIMA Card S$500K S$4,328 Principal
2x Supp
HSBC Prive Card S$500K S$5,328 Principal
3x Supp
amex centurionAMEX Centurion Not stated S$7,630 Principal#
All Supp^
*HSBC Premier customers pay S$497
^Supp. cardholders have unlimited access to Centurion Lounges, Plaza Premium Lounges, Delta Sky Clubs and Lufthansa Lounges. Only the first supp. cardholder has a Priority Pass (with 8x visits)
#Does not include airport restaurants

Now, itโ€™s very possible that Priority Pass and DragonPass have hiked the rates they charge for unlimited access, hence the nerfs. But if you ask anyone in the industry, theyโ€™ll tell you a big reason for the hike is the increase in lounge pass abuse over the years.

What counts as lounge pass abuse?

Chase Sapphire Lounge Hong Kong

In an ideal world, I imagine that banks and lounge programmes would prefer it if everyone with an unlimited lounge pass stuck to one utilisation per flight.

However, itโ€™s stretching the definition to say that anything more than that counts as abuse. I see nothing wrong with redeeming one visit for a meal, and then another to enter a lounge and relax or catch up on work before boarding. Heck, I also think itโ€™s not unreasonable to utilise three visits per flight: one spa treatment, one meal, one lounge. But if three is acceptable, then isnโ€™t it an arbitrary line youโ€™re drawing to say that three is OK but four isnโ€™t; four is OK but five isnโ€™t?

Be Relax, Changi Terminal 3

Perhaps. And in any case, I donโ€™t think itโ€™s helpful to define abuse based on number of utilisations alone, because frequent use does not equal abuse. X visits may be reasonable in one personโ€™s case but not anotherโ€™s (e.g. someone who visits multiple restaurants just to take photos for Instagram and ends up wasting the food).

You might define abuse as โ€œusing a lounge pass in ways that were not intendedโ€, but thatโ€™s also a bit nebulous. For example, on occasion Iโ€™ve popped into lounges for less than five minutes, because I wanted a bottle of water and didnโ€™t fancy paying airport prices, or because the MileCub needed a change and we wanted a clean restroom. Those probably arenโ€™t the types of uses the programme envisioned, but does that cross the threshold into abuse?

While weโ€™re at it, here are a few other scenarios worth mulling over. 

Going on a lounge safari

Most contract lounges arenโ€™t worth a safariโ€ฆif you can even get in!

A lounge safari involves hopping between several lounges before a flight, either out of curiosity, or to enjoy a range of different F&B and facilities. 

If Iโ€™m passing through an airport for the first time, I might visit several lounges in quick succession in order to review them, but otherwise I doubt many people actually go on contract lounge safaris. Why? Because most contract lounges are overcrowded and underwhelming. Iโ€™d happily do an airline lounge safari in certain airports (like oneworld at Changi), but I simply canโ€™t be bothered to hop between the SATS Premier Lounge and marhaba.

So maybe some people consider lounge safaris as abuse, but in any case I donโ€™t believe theyโ€™re a big contributor to the problemโ€” certainly not as much as restaurants anyway.

Taking away meals from restaurants

TGM, Changi Terminal 2

While itโ€™s quite clear that taking away food from the lounge is a no-no, what about taking away meals from restaurants?

I think itโ€™s perfectly fine to take away a meal from a restaurant if youโ€™re on a tight connection and intend to eat your meal while waiting to board, or on the plane.

I find it a bit more grey if youโ€™ve arrived at your final destination and take away the meal to eat at home, but I wouldnโ€™t be dogmatic about this since it could be argued that a lounge pass is intended to make your travel more comfortable (and your journey doesnโ€™t technically end until youโ€™re back home).

Selling your guest benefit

Ambassador Transit Lounge, Changi Terminal 3

You might recall that back in 2022, Singapore Airlines tightened its lounge guest policy to require that guests be travelling on the same flight as the primary passenger. This change was reported driven by a surge in people attempting to sell their guest privileges online.

 Well, if anything, itโ€™s even easier to sell the guest slot for a lounge membership, because the only requirement is that the guest holds a same-day boarding pass with any airline. Therefore, some lounge pass holders have attempted to monetise their guest benefits either by selling lounge access, or selling their restaurant dining credits at a steep discount.

To me, this is an obvious case of abuse, since the benefits arenโ€™t intended for resale. That said, for reasons I canโ€™t quite explain, I would be perfectly OK with offering my guest slot for free to someone I happened to spot in the vicinity of the lounge. Iโ€™ll freely admit that my logic is somewhat inconsistent, since either way the cost to the programme is the same, but there you have it.

Airport staff or pilots using lounge passes

By right, restaurants are supposed to verify that lounge pass holders have a corresponding boarding pass when redeeming set meals or credits. However, thereโ€™s a tremendous financial incentive for them to look the other way, and itโ€™s an open secret that some airport staff and pilots use lounge passes to redeem meals on a regular basis. 

Again, I think there can be little doubt that this constitutes abuse, since lounge passes are intended for bona fide travellers.

Using Priority Pass restaurant credits to buy non-consumables

Asian Street Kitchen at Changi Terminal 2

Restaurants donโ€™t just offer food. Some, like Asian Street Kitchen at Changi Terminal 2, run a roaring business selling merchandise like t-shirts, caps and tote bags, which can be purchased using the dining credits issued by Priority Pass. Some people take advantage of this by loading up every time they pass through the airport, and of course, items inevitably find their way onto Carousell.

Asian Street Kitchen merchandise | Photo: Seeing the World in Steps

Iโ€™m sure thereโ€™ll be some who voraciously defend such behaviour, and their arguments can sound very persuasive (โ€œwhat difference does it make to Priority Pass if I have a bowl of noodles or buy a tumbler?โ€). But Iโ€™m not comfortable with it, because leaving aside the fact that the T&Cs state that credits are valid for the purchase of meals and drinks (โ€œbut it doesnโ€™t say โ€œonlyโ€ meals and drinks!โ€), this rather goes against the spirit of the programme. Itโ€™s meant to provide you with a meal on your trip, not to decorate your home.

Why not add cooldown periods?

Cooldown periods would help limit abuse, without sacrificing unlimited lounge visits

Instead of nerfing unlimited lounge access, I wish that banks or lounge membership programmes simply enforced cooldown periods instead. While it wouldnโ€™t stop certain behaviours like selling guest allowances or redeeming meals without boarding passes, it would help to throttle the rate at which abuse can happen.

The Priority Pass Conditions of Use grant it the right to limit the number of times a member can redeem visits, but in practice I donโ€™t believe this is actually enforced. The only restrictions Iโ€™m aware of is that you canโ€™t visit the same lounge or restaurant more than once per 24 hours.

11. Priority Pass, payment card provider or other organisation may limit the number of times Customer can use their Means of Access to enter a Lounge or Merchant location within a time period and within the same arrival or departure location.

-Priority Pass

On the other hand, DragonPass has a โ€œfair use policyโ€ that stipulates a two-hour wait between lounge visits, and a five-hour wait between set meal redemptions (though banks are free to tighten these further).

Perhaps this explains why the cards with Priority Pass benefits implemented their nerfs relatively quickly, while the UOB Visa Infinite Metal Card (with DragonPass) will only do so a year from now (though they still made the decision to nerf, so perhaps they felt cooldown periods alone werenโ€™t enough).

Anyway itโ€™s water under the bridge, but a cooldown period, however unwelcome, would still have been better than the removal of unlimited visits altogether.

Conclusion

Some may argue that unlimited access means unlimited access, and if there were meant to be restrictions, then those should be put in black and white. And I can sympathise with that, because it sometimes feels like lounge programmes are talking out of both sides of their mouthโ€”they advertise unlimited access, then complain when people actually use it. 

But going back to the buffet analogy: buffets donโ€™t explicitly tell you how much you can eat, but they do expect you to exercise some degree of restraint. Thereโ€™s an unwritten understanding that youโ€™ll enjoy yourself without overdoing it, or else the buffet would have to raise prices for everyone or go out of business. 

While I donโ€™t pretend to be whiter than white, thereโ€™s certain behaviour thatโ€™s clearly pushing acceptable limits, and at the end of the day everyone gets penalised when the inevitable nerfs happen.

What would (and wouldnโ€™t) you consider to be lounge pass abuse?

Aaron Wong
Aaron Wong
Aaron founded The Milelion to help people travel better for less and impress chiobu. He was 50% successful.

Similar Articles

Comments

39 COMMENTS

Subscribe
Notify of
guest


39 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gary

Frankly lounge standards and quality have been dropping, so I increasingly do not see the benefit of accessing a 3rd rate (and typically packed!) cafeteria.

These days, most terminal side FnB are far more attractive to hang out even to pay a couple of bucks than a depressing lounge.

Stefan

Another consideration is the number of trips. If I take 100 flights per year (reasonable living in Singapore), then is 1 lounge visit per flight considered acceptable?

I am putting a deeper strain on the system than someone who flies 10 times a year and hops around five lounges for each flight.

Hector Spondooley

Back in the day, most frequent flyers would have status on a primary alliance and use that for lounges with lounge membership filling the gap when you hopped alliance, flew on unaligned or low cost. Nowadays, it is hard to retain status and particularly when the majors have retreated from smaller locations or become uncompetitive. So my priority pass was an emergency now it is my main lounge access

Dave

Thank you. The Prestige Telegram group has been rather disgusting in recent months, turning into a contest of how far the boundaries can be pushed. Glad thatโ€™s over โ€” though itโ€™s unfortunate for frequent travelers who burned through 12 legitimate lounge visits in just 2 months.

top g

exactly. and we know who are the usual BBFAs flaunting their lounge visits like a trophy. yet they donโ€™t feel any tinge of remorse for contributing blatantly to the nerf.

BBFA

please cut us some slack. itโ€™s already sad enough when the highlight of my day is to flex in a online group chat because I donโ€™t have actual friends in real life who cares.

David

Totally agreed with you on this. And they actually think that it is okay to do it as it is the lounge / restaurant operators fault for not stopping them. And everyone was trying to outbeat each other to showcase who can do much better than the one before. I am disgusted to the max by these people.

Wee Lee

Agreed, too bad the group is no longer moderated. Unreadable.

Apply Common Sense

This article over-analyses it. I think the situation is quite simple. First, the bank will be charged each time you enter a lounge. Every time I have entered a lounge I have been asked for my boarding pass โ€“ so from my experience they do check that you are travelling that day. So, what does commonsense say โ€œunlimited lounge passesโ€ mean? I think commonsense says that if you are departing on a flight today, then you can enter one lounge today, before that flight. Pretty simple really. Of course if I travel 10 times a month I am going toโ€ฆ Read more ยป

Apply Common Sense

Oh, and to answer the actual question โ€œwhat counts as lounge abuse?โ€, I think the answer is also simple. Commonsense say you can enter 1 lounge before a flight. If you enter more than 1 lounge for 1 flight, then that is counted as abuse.

uncommon sense

tell me you work for a bank without telling me you work for a bank.

L T

My common sense tells me that, with the absence of any rules or guidelines indicating the contrary, there is absolutely nothing wrong with utilising two credits in a single flight to enjoy a meal at a restaurant before retreating to a lounge for a drink in a quieter environment.
I guess I donโ€™t possess the same โ€˜commonsenseโ€™ as you, then.

What if paying?

Ask yourself this. If you had to pay, say $50, to enter, would you do this? Or would you weigh up the pros and cons of each lounge and then select the 1 lounge that best met your requirements?

L T

I donโ€™t think this principle makes sense. If I had to pay $50 to utilise a lounge or restaurant, I would simply forego the experience โ€“ I could probably get more utility for less in another establishment, especially in SIN. The problem comes about precisely because we are receiving a benefit that is advertised as unlimited. I donโ€™t think your guideline of one visit per flight is even hinted at anywhere. Which is what leads us to this moral grey area, I suppose. Iโ€™m personally opposed to flagrant wasteful usage, but clearly also view the one-per-flight guideline to be needlesslyโ€ฆ Read more ยป

Alian

Biggest issue is enforcing rules like count down etc. this means PP would need to deploy systems to every proprietor to do checks or upgrade current systems. Not sure exactly what they currently have but itโ€™ll be costly. Next youโ€™ll need to train the folks on the new system plus the rules that comes with it. Sometimes itโ€™s just not worth the hassle and giving ppl too many options and variety becomes a bad thing to manage. Itโ€™s the ppl that spoil market and thatโ€™s the hardest part to manage. Good intentions get abused. I think this is life andโ€ฆ Read more ยป

Renz

I only go to lounge for a couple glasses of alcohol (and i already encountered quiet a few lounges which only offering coffee and tea โ€“ not even food not to mention alcohol), maybe to do some light work and shower during transit especially after an economy flight.

Contract lounges anyway are bad (old, underwhelming and some even bad smell) in most cases.
I personally dont understand why people are still think that go into a lounge is a kind of elevated status.
Flying business class and above and using the airlines own premium lounges is always better choice.

Right..

I donโ€™t think I disagree with any of your points but I donโ€™t see how it relates to the question, or attempts to answer the question

HongKeeTongMan

Just got my HSBC VI renewal posted on my cc bill today. Wondering if I renew that the unlimited visits status will be revised afterwardsโ€ฆI have 2 supplementary card members on this card. The intent is at least to offer the lounge access to my family members when I renew. Wondering if itโ€™s a good time to do so now, lest the nerf happens and my supplementary card members get impacted, which was the whole point of the renewal exercise with HSBC VIโ€ฆ

Serf

it is inevitable given the increasing number of youtubers/social media posts on how to best utilise the unlimited lounge passes

Swimmingpineapple

// 2022, Singapore Airlines tightened its lounge guest policy
Apologies if Might sound pedantic here however This is a star alliance wide amendment and not unique to only Singaporeair.

Swimmingpineapple

Yep. The 2021 amendment started the ball rolling. SQ (and a few others iirc) had their airline specific/ffp exceptions as well.

anon

My friends joke that restaurants lose money in a buffet when i eat LOLโ€ฆ

QQ Cards Critic

Lounge are the ones making it difficult from what I see, back then even with unlimited they refuse my entry just because they self made policy that only departure gets to enjoy the entry, the lounges are to be blamed, and like what most people are saying quality has dropped TREMENDOUSLY, I see hair not picked up in floor traps, food not top up sufficiently, disgruntled staff. SATS facilities are failing and food options crappy at best, even with unlimited, how much food one can eat before he leaves or does he not have a flight to eventually board

Cheapo

This article can be summarised as โ€˜itโ€™s not abuse if I do itโ€™.

Another Cheapo

Yup, I personally would think using the lounge for the purpose of diaper change and grabbing a free bottle of water is a form of abuse. You wouldnโ€™t have done it if you have to pay for it.

less cheap

itโ€™s a very strange argument to say something is abuse because โ€œyou wouldnโ€™t have done it if you have to pay for itโ€. Not many people would visit asian street kitchen if they have to pay for it (the food is overpriced and poor quality), nor would they visit sats/marhaba etc if they have to pay for it as the lounges are so overcrowded and the F&B is poor.

A pilot

What a fucking stupid take that pilots and airline crew are not bona fide travelers.

Why

And this, with the attitude, is why itโ€™s going down the drain. And Aaron is right, bona fide travelers in the airport have a boarding pass, else they canโ€™t โ€˜travelโ€™ on the plane. Do pilots and aircrew get a regular boarding pass too?

Pointless

Must exclude aircrew on duty who donโ€™t have a valid passenger boarding pass. Bank giving free meals/alcohol/merch to me at my workplace, every day, more than once a day. Wow. I think the concept of a lounge is to provide comfort/convenience while waiting for a flight. One usage every 4-6 hours would limit everyone to one โ€˜convenienceโ€™ visit per flight. I donโ€™t think many people would pay (is it $50?) for an extra lounge entry to get water or to change a diaper (Iโ€™m a parent too). Frequent work trip travelers > 10X/mth will definitely benefit more. But one usage/flightโ€ฆ Read more ยป

Milestones

No harm anyways in Singapore, contract lounges are just like glorified food courts. I might argue that food courts have better food
Other lounges might be better
Anyways, the average traveller is probably not going to feel the nerf

Paul@Sudnry

PP is the abuse. PP doesnt financially reward the lounge and yet the PP members are trough feeders looking for maximum use and benefits. Lounges are generally a airline loyalty perk. PP members have no loyalty. They consume space and capacity for true FFs. In Australia you will struggle to find a lounge that accepts PP for this reason. The airlines dont want the small amount they could be paid when that consumer os seeking maximum consumption. Its a loss maker.

Last edited 19 days ago by Paul@Sudnry
Ben Jamin

Rex lounges in Australia accept PP.

Kensam

I just need one lounge. Why abuse the bank?

Midnight Melodies

These unlimited lounge passes are only useful for individuals who fly economy and trying to squeeze out every drop they can. So clearly there are individuals who abuse it and ignore the fair use policy. Imagine a budget flyer buying super cheap discounted tickets and fly in and out every other day to partake in free meals. Personally, I have these unlimited passes and I have not yet to use it once. Firstly, lounge access is already included in the ticket and I never want to be at the airport more than 1.5 โ€“ 2 hrs in advance. Lounges areโ€ฆ Read more ยป

Raymond

Even if itโ€™s just to get a bottle of water, the lounge will pass the full cost to the bank so bank need to make sense of it. For me, I would prefer if the bank say keep it unlimited for anyway who had used the lounge passes less than 12 times a year in the past, because thatโ€™s unlikely going to change their behaviour and sends a strong signal to people who โ€œabusesโ€ it. I had seen way to many instances of people lounge hop just because they can, and in the end itโ€™s all about the P&L.

CREDIT CARD SIGN UP BONUSES

Advertisment

Featured Deals

Advertisment

Follow us

7,110FansLike
14,085FollowersFollow

TAGS